How the pieces fit —
and what to do when they don't.
The hardest problems in security aren't technical. I think through what that means for the people building programs and the founders building the companies behind them.
Follow the thinkingWhat's coming
Eight pieces in progress
Five of these map to the bets every modern security program needs to be making this year, named at passarel.com. The rest are operator notes on judgment, careers, and timing. Some are solo analysis. Several are co-authored with practitioners I've worked alongside.
When to Sell
Your Hiring Workflow Is a Security Workflow
Your AI Agents Have No Badge, No Boss, and No Audit Trail
AI Can Break Your Software. Now What?
When to Stay
Genuine Opportunity or Noise
Who Actually Owns Security Accountability?
Work with me
Passarel
If you're a security leader trying to figure out which bets your program needs to be making this year, and which partners can deliver them, that's what Passarel is for. Five bets, one accountable owner, end to end.
connect@passarel.com →Staris AI
If your team is still relying on point-in-time pentesting, there's a better model. Staris delivers continuous attack path validation — built for security teams that want to stay ahead, not just catch up.
staris.tech/contact →Get it in your inbox
One thesis.
Every other Tuesday.
One problem, one framework, one implication for how you build or sell. Written for security leaders who already know the landscape and founders who are living inside it.
No spam. Unsubscribe any time.